Retention and Increase of Section 301 Tariffs

Jack LaMadeleine • May 20, 2024

The U.S. Trade Representative's Office released their four-year review of the Section 301 Tariffs which call for retaining the duties currently in place along with an increase on entire classes of Chinese imports.

Retention and Increase of Section 301 Tariffs

In a global economic landscape rife with competition and challenges, the Biden-Harris Administration has taken decisive action to safeguard American workers and industries from unfair trade practices, particularly those emanating from China. President Biden's economic plan is not just about bolstering domestic industries but also about ensuring fair competition on the global stage.


China's practices, including technology transfer coercion, intellectual property theft, and market-distorting subsidies, pose significant threats to American businesses and workers. The Administration's response, outlined in the recent directives, reflects a commitment to leveling the playing field and fostering an environment where American industries can thrive.


One of the key measures announced is the increase in tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 on $18 billion of imports from China. This move is targeted at strategic sectors where American investments are substantial, such as steel, semiconductors, electric vehicles (EVs), and medical products. These tariffs aim to counteract the unfair advantages gained by Chinese industries through non-market practices.


The rationale behind each tariff increase is grounded in the need to protect critical American industries and promote domestic manufacturing. Let's delve into some of the sectors affected and the reasoning behind the tariff adjustments:


Steel and Aluminum: By increasing tariffs on steel and aluminum products, the Administration seeks to shield American industries from China's overcapacity and unfair competition. Investments in clean manufacturing projects, supported by legislative acts like the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, underscore the commitment to revitalizing these sectors while ensuring environmental sustainability.


Semiconductors: Recognizing the strategic importance of semiconductor manufacturing, the Administration is bolstering domestic capacity through significant investments. By raising tariffs on semiconductors, the aim is to safeguard these investments and prevent overreliance on Chinese suppliers, thus ensuring the resilience of critical supply chains.


Electric Vehicles (EVs): With China's subsidization leading to a surge in EV exports, the tariff hike aims to protect American manufacturers and investments in the burgeoning EV market. The Administration's focus on incentivizing domestic EV production aligns with its broader clean energy agenda and commitment to creating high-quality jobs in the automotive sector.


Batteries, Critical Minerals, and Solar Cells: The tariff adjustments in these sectors are geared towards reducing dependence on Chinese-controlled supply chains. By incentivizing domestic production and addressing vulnerabilities in critical minerals sourcing, the Administration aims to strengthen America's energy security and advance its clean energy goals.


Ship-to-Shore Cranes and Medical Products: These tariff increases are essential for safeguarding key infrastructure and ensuring a robust domestic industrial base for critical medical supplies. By mitigating risks associated with overreliance on Chinese imports, the Administration is prioritizing both national security and public health interests.


A breakdown of duties expect to or have already increased:

Semiconductors: 25% to 50% in 2025

Steel and Aluminum: 0-7.5% to 25% in 2024

Electric Vehicles: 25% to 100% in 2024

Lithium-Ion EV batteries: 7.5% to 25% in 2024

Lithium-Ion Non-EV batteries: 7.5% to 25% in 2026

Battery Parts: 7.5% to 25%

Natural Graphite and Permanent Magnets: 0% to 25% in 2024

Solar Cells: 25% to 50% in 2024

Ship-to-Shore Cranes: 0% to 25% in 2024

Syringes and Needles: 0% to 50% in 2024

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): 0-7.5% to 25% in 2024

Rubber Medical and Surgical Gloves will increase from 7.5% to 25% in 2026



President Biden's approach to trade underscores a commitment to fair competition, strategic investment, and the protection of American workers. Rather than resorting to blanket tariffs or isolationist policies, the Administration is leveraging targeted measures to address specific challenges while fostering cooperation with international partners.


Moreover, the Administration's emphasis on comprehensive economic policies, such as the Investing in America agenda, reflects a holistic approach to revitalizing domestic industries and creating sustainable, high-paying jobs. By aligning trade actions with broader economic goals, President Biden aims to build a more resilient and competitive American economy.


In conclusion, the recent directives on trade practices exemplify the Biden-Harris Administration's proactive stance in safeguarding American interests and promoting fair competition in the global marketplace. Through targeted tariff adjustments and strategic investments, the Administration is laying the groundwork for a stronger, more resilient economy that benefits American workers and industries alike.


Reference: "FACT SHEET: President Biden Takes Action to Protect American Workers and Businesses from China's Unfair Trade Practices"

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/05/14/fact-sheet-president-biden-takes-action-to-protect-american-workers-and-businesses-from-chinas-unfair-trade-practices/

Get actionable advice on cost-saving strategies that boost your bottom line.

Subscribe here:


landmark Supreme Court ruling
By Jill LaMadeleine March 3, 2026
IEEPA tariffs ruled illegal by the Supreme Court — CBP has stopped collecting. New Section 122 duties are now in effect. Here's what importers need to know.
Jewelry TV Duty Drawback
By Jill LaMadeleine February 17, 2026
JTV cut duty drawback workload 50% after switching to ITM. See how Jewelry Television recovered a near-complete backlog and transformed their entire process.
PEM America
By Jill LaMadeleine February 4, 2026
Ed Greenberg, Managing Director of PEM America, explains the hundreds of thousands of dollars his company recovered through duty drawback.
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether IEEPA tariffs are legal
By Jill LaMadeleine January 27, 2026
Supreme Court will soon rule on IEEPA tariffs. Learn the 3 steps importers must take now to protect refund rights before liquidation deadlines pass.
Detailed analysis of a duty-free classification for video prints.
By Jill LaMadeleine January 19, 2026
$450K in duty refunds realized through a detailed analysis and evaluation of duty-free classifications made by International Tariff Management.
SCOTUS to Rule on Reciprocal Tariffs
By Jill LaMadeleine January 6, 2026
January 2026 trade update: OBBBA targets tobacco drawback, Section 232 delayed, reciprocal tariffs still eligible for refunds. Plus: why 2026 is enforcement year.
2025-a-year-of-change-and-vigilance
By Jill LaMadeleine December 9, 2025
2025 began with the promise and the introduction of sweeping, high tariffs on nearly all imports. While there was a transition to a two-tiered system including broad tariffs and country-specific rates, the mid-year brought pauses, renegotiations, and recalibrations.
Jewelry Manufacturing
By Jill LaMadeleine November 14, 2025
The benefits that we realized working with International Tariff Management was that they made the process seamless from beginning to end.
Supreme Court of the United States
By Jill LaMadeleine November 4, 2025
Oral arguments are scheduled to begin this week with the Supreme Court in regards to the Reciprocal Tariffs - starting Wednesday November 5, 2025.
International Containers
By Jill LaMadeleine October 13, 2025
The Supreme Court, which resumed on October 6th, has agreed to hear the case in regards to the reciprocal-tariffs (IEEPA), on an expedited basis.
Satellite manufacturer claims reciprocal duties on goods launched into space
By Jill LaMadeleine September 15, 2025
By leveraging the option to claim drawback on items launched into space, the importer was able to recover substantial funds — and cover these unexpected costs which they in turn did not have to pass along to their manufacturing partners.
Reciprocal Tariffs
By Jill LaMadeleine September 9, 2025
The latest on the reciprocal tariffs have them hanging in the balance. On August 29, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, affirmed a lower court decision finding that the reciprocal tariffs exceeded presidential authority under IEEPA. The court stayed its mandate until October 14, 2025, giving the g
Under the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA), USCBP Officers investigate and halt duty evasion.
By Jill LaMadeleine August 15, 2025
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has officially elevated trade and customs fraud—including tariff evasion—to its #2 enforcement priority. This shift is part of a broader strategy under the Trump administration to enforce high tariffs and ensure accurate revenue collection.
EU-US Trade ealD
By Jill LaMadeleine August 4, 2025
On July 27th, the Trump Administration announced a deal with the EU imposing tariffs of 15% on most goods entering the US from Europe. As of August 1st, the 15% blanket tariff will cover most US imports. The US will have a 0% tariff for some items including equipment for US manufacturing and generic medicines.
trade agreement with Vietnam
By Jill LaMadeleine July 8, 2025
Last week, it was announced that the U.S. had reached a preliminary trade agreement with Vietnam. The agreement involves a 20% tariff on Vietnamese goods.
Importer of Yogurt
By Jill LaMadeleine June 18, 2025
The American company reached out to ITM for guidance. They were pleased to learn that under U.S. Customs regulations, they could file for duty drawback—a refund of duties paid—on expired and destroyed goods. Within just four months, ITM had successfully obtained the required authorizations and filed all claims related to the product destructions. Due to ITM’s relationship USCBP, and their expertise, over $850,000 in duty refunds was recouped.