Understanding the Impact of Interest on Delayed Refunds in Duty Drawback Cases

Jack LaMadeleine • March 7, 2024

The implications in the case of Union of India and ORS. v. Patil and Sons Belgaum

Understanding the Impact of Interest on Delayed Refunds in Duty Drawback Cases

In a recent ruling, the Honorable Supreme Court addressed a critical issue concerning delayed refunds of deemed-export duty drawback. The case of UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. VERSUS M/S. B.T. PATIL AND SONS BELGAUM (CONSTRUCTION) PVT. LTD. sheds light on the entitlement of interest on delayed refunds, especially in cases where duty drawback claims are involved.


M/s. B.T. Patil and Sons Belgaum (Construction) Pvt. Ltd. (“the Respondent”) found themselves entangled in a dispute over the refund of duty drawback related to their civil construction project for the Koyna Hydro Electric Power Project. Despite completing the project in March 1996, they faced obstacles in obtaining the refund under the deemed export scheme.


The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) initially denied the refund, citing ineligibility under the Exim Policy, 1992-1997. However, subsequent circulars and clarifications paved the way for the Respondent to claim the refund, albeit with significant delay.


The Respondent pursued their claim for interest on the delayed refund through legal channels. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court, which upheld the decision of the High Court of Karnataka, awarding 15% interest on the delayed refund of duty drawback. The interest was calculated from the date of the refund application.


The Supreme Court's ruling underscores several crucial points:

  • Deemed Export Status: The Court recognized the supply of goods for the construction project as a case of ‘deemed export,’ making the Respondent eligible for duty drawback benefits.
  • Delayed Refunds: Despite the delay in processing the refund, the Court affirmed the entitlement of interest, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution in such matters.
  • Legal Precedents: The Court referred to previous rulings and legal provisions, establishing a framework for determining interest on delayed refunds in duty drawback cases.
  • Interest Calculation: The Court clarified the methodology for calculating interest, considering the period between the refund application and its eventual payment.


This ruling carries significant implications for taxpayers involved in duty drawback claims such as:

  • Timely Claim Processing: Taxpayers should ensure prompt submission of refund applications to avoid delays in processing and payment.
  • Legal Awareness: Understanding relevant legal provisions and precedents can strengthen taxpayers’ positions in disputes over duty drawback refunds.
  • Financial Impact: The award of interest on delayed refunds underscores the financial implications of administrative delays, highlighting the importance of efficient refund mechanisms.


The case of M/S. B.T. PATIL AND SONS BELGAUM (CONSTRUCTION) PVT. LTD. serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding duty drawback refunds and the importance of timely resolution. By upholding the entitlement of interest on delayed refunds, the Supreme Court reaffirms the rights of taxpayers and emphasizes the need for procedural efficiency in tax administration.


By Jack LaMadeleine - March 7th, 2024


Reference: “Interest of 15% is allowed on delayed refund of deemed-export duty-drawback” by CA Bimal Jain

https://www.taxmanagementindia.com/visitor/detail_article.asp?ArticleID=12349

New tariffs on imported goods from most countries

Newsletter | April 2025 | Update: Tariffs on imported goods

By Jill LaMadeleine • April 3, 2025
Effective at 12:01 a.m. on April 5, 2025, a 10% baseline tariff on imported goods from most countries, with a few exceptions, will be implemented. This baseline is in addition to regular duties and fees, current IEPPA duties, Section 201 duties, Section 301 duties, and any applicable AD/CVD.
New tariffs now in effect

Newsletter | March 2025

By Jill LaMadeleine • March 4, 2025
As of 12:01am, March 4, 2025, tariffs of 25% are effective on products from Canada and Mexico and energy products from Canada are subject to a 10% duty. Products that are presently excluded from these tariffs include goods that are for personal use, goods entered under Chapter 98, donations that are imported under HTSUS 9903.01.21and merely information items included under HTSUS 9903.01.22. All other imported items will carry the 25% tariff and no drawback is permitted on these duties.
Steel and Aluminum Tariffs

Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: Key Changes and Upcoming Deadlines

By Jill LaMadeleine • February 18, 2025
The upcoming changes to steel and aluminum tariffs will significantly impact the steel and aluminum industries, with numerous provisions to ensure compliance. Importers, exporters, and manufacturers in the steel and aluminum sectors should stay informed about the latest developments and ensure their operations are aligned with these new tariff regulations.

New Executive Order Impacts Imports from China: Additional Tariffs and the End of De Minimis Exemption

By Jack LaMadeleine • February 5, 2025
On February 1, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) that imposes an additional 10% ad valorem tariff on most imports from China, which includes products of Hong Kong. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) quickly followed up with important guidance regarding these changes, particularly impacting the trade community's handling of de minimis shipments from China. Effective February 4, 2025, de minimis shipments from China will no longer be eligible for the administrative exemption from duty under 19 U.S.C. § 1321(a)(2)(C), and will be subject to the new 10% tariffs.  Here's everything you need to know about the changes:

De Minimus Update

By Jack LaMadeleine • February 5, 2025
The recent guidance from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regarding de minimis shipments from China is a significant update. Here's a quick breakdown of the key points in the alert:

Newsletter | Feb 2025

By Jack LaMadeleine • February 1, 2025
International Tariff Management's February Newsletter

Trump's 25% Tariff on Mexico and Canada, Day One Pledge Delayed

By Jack LaMadeleine • January 27, 2025
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump was sworn in for his second term, and with that came big promises regarding trade policy. But a significant shift came just days later, on January 21, when Trump announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada—set to go into effect on February 1, 2025. This move represents a dramatic change in North American trade relations and could have wide-reaching effects on American consumers. At a signing ceremony in the Oval Office, Trump revealed that his administration would roll out tariffs on goods from two of the U.S.'s largest trading partners, Mexico and Canada. However, this new tariff decision doesn’t fully align with the aggressive trade strategy Trump promised during his campaign. The sweeping tariffs Trump pledged on his first day in office, including a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada, have yet to materialize. His executive action, while still outlining a broad trade policy overhaul, serves more as a placeholder for a more extensive, long-term plan.
US Trade Agreement with Taiwan

US Takes First Step in Trade Agreement with Taiwan

By Jack LaMadeleine • January 9, 2025
Although the United States and Taiwan (officially known as the Republic of China) do not maintain formal diplomatic relations, the two countries share strong cooperation in several areas, including trade. Trade discussions are managed through the American Institute in Taiwan and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the U.S., under an arrangement called the U.S.-Taiwan Initiative on 21st Century Trade. This framework allows both nations to address trade and investment issues, while working toward mutual priorities over time.

Understanding the Recent Section 301 Tariff Updates: Key Changes and Filing Instructions

By Jack LaMadeleine • January 3, 2025
As of January 1, 2025, new tariff rates on certain Chinese imports will go into effect, as part of the ongoing Section 301 investigation into China's trade practices, particularly regarding technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) has announced additional tariff increases under the Section 301 Four Year Review, which impacts a range of products, including certain tungsten products, solar wafers, and polysilicon. If you're involved in importing these products or handling customs filings, it’s crucial to understand the latest developments and the steps required to comply with the updated regulations.

Newsletter | Jan 2025

By Jack LaMadeleine • January 1, 2025
Our team is excited to be back for another year of maximizing refunds and providing exceptional service for our partners!
More Posts